
In California, collaborative agreements must be reviewed periodically. California requires NP collaborative agreements, called Standardized Procedures, to include a method for periodic review, but it does not set a specific interval or timeline for that review1. When prescribing under a protocol, the agreement must also include a method for periodic review of the NP’s competence (including peer review) and a review of the provisions of the Standardized Procedure2.
Standardized Procedures must be written, dated, and signed, and they must provide a method for periodic review of the procedures themselves1. Ensure your protocols explicitly describe how the review will occur and how competence will be evaluated, as required when furnishing or ordering drugs and devices under physician-supervised protocols2.
Note that NPs approved as 103 or 104 NPs under AB 890 may practice without Standardized Procedures in specified settings; where no collaborative agreement exists, these SP review requirements do not apply34.